Search strategy details for UK AHP research capacity building scoping review
Articles were searched from the identified key databases for
Allied Health Professions: Medline (Ebsco), CINAHL Complete, PubMed, APA
PsycInfo and SPORTDiscus.
The Population Concept Context (PCC) framework was utilised
to identify the key terms that would be used to build the searches in the
database’s search engines 1.
The PCC components and the keywords are demonstrated in the table below.
|
PCC
Components and definitions |
Identified
keywords/terms (and how they were constructed in the search engines) |
|
Population
(UK formally recognised Allied Health Professions) |
Art therapist
(“art therap*”), Drama therapist (“drama therap*”), Music therapist (“music
therap*”), Dietitian (dietitian*/dietetic*), Osteopath (osteopath*), Operating
department practitioner (“operating department practi*”/ODP), Speech and
language therapist (“speech and language therap*”), Diagnostic
radiographer (“diagnostic radiograph*”/radiograph*), Therapeutic
radiographer (“therapeutic radiograph*”), Paramedic (“paramedic*), Podiatrist
(“podiatr*), Physiotherapist (“physiotherap*”), Occupational therapist (“occupational
therap*”), Orthoptist (orthopti*), Prosthetist/orthotist (prostheti*/orthoti*) |
|
Concept (research
culture and research capacity and capability building) |
Research
culture, Research capability, Research
capacity, Research activity, Research skills, Capacity
building, Research capacity development, Organisational culture research, Research support, Medical
research, Health services research, Health research, Allied health research, Research
barriers, Research enablers, Research motivators, Research strategy, Workforce
development, Action research, Research participation, Research
knowledge |
|
Context
(within the UK) |
United
Kingdom |
The search utilised Boolean operators “OR” and “AND” to
produce search results that are more focused to the research’s enquiry.
Truncations were used to identify substitutes and quotation marks to search for
exact phrases 2.
An inclusion/exclusion criterion was utilised to define the
characteristics of the articles that would be included in the scoping review to
address the review’s enquiry 3.
The table below shows the inclusion/exclusion criteria that was developed and
applied to the studies for eligibility.
|
Inclusion |
Exclusion |
|
Studies
involving qualified allied health professionals from one or more professional
groupings in the UK. |
Letters,
editorial and opinion publications. |
|
Studies
exploring research capacity and culture issues and the interventions to
increase the capacity and culture of AHPs. |
Narrative
reviews. |
|
Primary
research involving qualitative, quantitative or mixed methodologies. |
Studies
focusing on AHPs that are outside of the UK. |
|
Studies
utilizing a systematic search strategy such as systematic reviews and scoping
reviews. |
|
|
Publications
written in the English language. |
|
|
No date
limits on studies. |
|
1. University of South Australia. Apply PCC. https://guides.library.unisa.edu.au/ScopingReviews/ApplyPCC#:~:text=PCC%20%28Population%20%28or%20participants%29%2FConcept%2FContext%29%20framework%20is%20recommended%20by,missed%20inclusion%20and%20exclusion%20criteria%20for%20your%20protocol. Updated 2023. Accessed Sep 20, 2022.
2. Spencer SM. Google power search. Beijing: Sebastopol,
California; 2011.
3. Patino CM, Ferreira JC. Inclusion and exclusion criteria in
research studies: Definitions and why they matter. J Bras Pneumol.
2018;44(2):84. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6044655/. Accessed Jun 23, 2024.
doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562018000000088.
Comments
Post a Comment
All views are valued, but kindly maintain respect for the author and others who may also comment under the same post.